01 / CONTEXT

The question behind the work.

What structure can be recovered without using labels, and how sensitive is that structure to a distance metric?

Dataset & environment

Academic clustering explorations; no assignment dataset has been attached to this portfolio.

02 / THE APPROACH

From the idea to the method.

  1. Scale continuous features and inspect pairwise distances.
  2. Compare linkage criteria and examine a dendrogram.
  3. Evaluate several cluster counts using silhouette scores and qualitative inspection.
03 / ACADEMIC FOCUS

What this study explores.

  • Academic focus: hierarchical clustering and distance-based analysis.
  • Interpreting dendrograms and comparing cluster separation.
04 / EVALUATION

How to assess it carefully.

Use silhouette analysis, stability under resampling, and domain interpretation rather than treating a single score as proof.

05 / RESULTS & LIMITATIONS

What is documented.

Experimental artifacts and verified numerical results have not been published. The interactive visuals explain the method; they are not benchmark results.

Training curves, accuracy comparisons, and repository links will be added alongside the corresponding artifacts. No unverified benchmark numbers are shown.

06 / TAKEAWAYS & NEXT STEPS

A foundation for the next experiment.

  • Clusters depend on the feature representation and the definition of distance.

Future updates can include code, screenshots, reproducibility instructions, and verified outcomes.

Continue exploring